Tuesday, September 21, 2010

A man of no fortune, and with a name to come



Also from Canto 1 (Pound):

Unsheathed the narrow sword,
I sat to keep off the impetuous impotent dead,
Till I should hear Tiresias.
But first Elpenor came, our friend Elpenor,
Unburied, cast on the wide earth,
Limbs that we left in the house of Circe,
Unwept, unwrapped in the sepulchre, since toils urged other.
Pitiful spirit. And I cried in hurried speech:
"Elpenor, how art thou come to this dark coast?
"Cam'st thou afoot, outstripping seamen?"
And he in heavy speech:
"Ill fate and abundant wine. I slept in Crice's ingle.
"Going down the long ladder unguarded,
"I fell against the buttress,
"Shattered the nape-nerve, the soul sought Avernus.
"But thou, O King, I bid remember me, unwept, unburied,
"Heap up mine arms, be tomb by sea-bord, and inscribed:
"A man of no fortune, and with a name to come.
"And set my oar up, that I swung mid fellows."

Then Anticlea came



A lovely and ghostly circularity. Ezra Pound, Canto I:

And Anticlea came, whom I beat off, and then Tiresias Theban,
Holding his golden wand, knew me, and spoke first:
"A second time? why? man of ill star,
"Facing the sunless dead and this joyless region?
"Stand from the fosse, leave me my bloody bever
"For soothsay."
And I stepped back,
And he strong with the blood, said then: "Odysseus
"Shalt return through spiteful Neptune, over dark seas,
"Lose all companions." Then Anticlea came.

Monday, September 20, 2010

Justice.



There's a very touching moment near the end of both The Ring (2002) and Ringu (1998) where the female-maternal protagonist gets to the heart of the matter, finds the virginal youth (brutally misunderstood and mistreated in her own time), and digs her up from the well. The sentimentality is near overwhelming. The original infraction is brought to light and the young girl's story is told.

It would appear to be a reestablishment of the law: Moral law necessitates access to the truth regarding the original transgressive act, and where applicable, those guilty parties exposed are punished.

Though the murderers (no longer living or present) cannot face punishment, at least the truth is uncovered here. But as we all know, the ghost comes back the very next day, which is of course the surprise twist of the films. Up until this point, the narrative is one centered around moral rectitude: teens are dying, and the source is found to be a ghost or ghostly incarnation. The ghost must pay. Then the ghost is found to be yet another victim of an equally appalling injustice; now this must be set right. Except redeeming and acknowledging the ghostchild does not retire her killing streak.

The only solution: a propagation of terror, a perpetual state of law disjuncture.

Friday, August 20, 2010

how very Scientifick



You’ll note how very Scientifick we are here, Gentlemen.
Yet […] ancient Beliefs will persist”
(Mason & Dixon 37)

Thursday, August 19, 2010

Slothrop's Anthem

There is a Hand to turn the time,
Though thy Glass today be run,
Till the Light hath brought the Towers low
Find the last poor Pret'rite one . . .
Till the Riders sleep by ev'ry road,
All through our crippl'd Zone,
With a face on ev'ry mountainside,
And a Soul in ev'ry stone. . . .
-GR 760

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Too Late.


"[a plastic bag] wraps around my head, so superfine and transparent I don't know it's there really until too late. A plastic shroud, smothering me to my death...." (GR 756).

A recurring theme at the end of Gravity's Rainbow is that it is too late. It's always too late. Slothrop has nowhere to go, especially once we have sufficiently demystified his relationship to the V-2; the trauma was done too long ago to do anything about it now. It's obviously too late for Bianca. Tchitcherine can't or won't recognize his half-brother. Poor Roger Mexico. And of course the War is over. It's been over more or less since Part II, yet we go on and on in the Zone, somewhere after point zero. The trauma of the post. And to make matters worse, we realize we're not living just a few months after the war, but some of the last pages remind us of what we already knew all along, but hid from consciousness: we're actually some forty years after the war. But isn't this the point the text tries to arouse-- this l'esprit de l'escalier vision that reminds us human consciousness is nothing more than one instance of being too late after another.

This recalls to mind a Wharton story, "Afterward." The premise is that the main characters will encounter a ghost, they are warned, but won't recognize it as such until afterward, long afterward, once it is too late. The movement of the plot is thus predictable, as its whole thread is given away in the first line ("Oh, there is one, of course, but you'll never know it"), which itself is given too early, before context, and thus the very meaning of the words (and the climax of the story) comes too late. Anachronistic by nature, the ghost (c.f. King Hamlet) always arrives tardy-- we can do nothing to prevent the late king's death; all that's left is vengeance or counter-action (c.f. Counterforce). Poor Mary Boyne, too attentive to sorting out the past, looking for what ghosts she could have encountered, that she fulfills the prophecy by overlooking the present moment when the obvious ghost arrives.

On a final note, "Berenice" by Poe figures a man who is always living too late, starting at (or even before?) his death, which simultaneously announces the death of his mother. Growing up in a library, removed from "reality," he develops a sort of inversion whereby reality-proper is foreign and illusory and the fantastic and supernatural tales of narrative fiction around him don't simply represent the real, they are the real. Thus, like Gravity's Rainbow, this narrator configures a mode of being that is not predicated on cause-and-effect, but rather on effect-and-cause (in other words, it's not that the portrait of Gertrude Stein looks like Stein herself, but rather that Gertrude Stein looks like her portrait). The tragedy of our narrator in this Poe story is realized when, after waking from some trance-like blackout, he slowly comes to realize what he has done: he has pulled all of the teeth from his recently-deceased beloved. The realization of the action comes--narratively speaking--before the action itself. It is this action, interestingly enough, that seems to materialize a ghost of his beloved who, having died a few pages earlier, awakens screaming (though with the explanation that she was merely in a catatonic epileptic trance herself, only appearing dead). The ghost has risen, but unfortunately--for as difficult as teeth may be to extract, they are far more difficult to implant; this I know--it is too late for her.

"It may be too late to go home" (Gravity's Rainbow 744).

Monday, July 26, 2010

Fathers, Sons, [Holy] Ghosts


In The Shining, there's a point about half-way through when Jack's father speaks to him, telling him to kill his family:
'No!' he [Jack] screamed back. 'You're dead, you're in your grave, you're not in me at all!' Because he had cut all the father out of him and it was not right that he should come back, creeping through this hotel two thousand miles from the New England town where his father had lived and died.

Though King takes a [very disappointing] turn to relying so heavily on supernatural alone, sacrificing more psychologically engaging directions (which, arguably Kubrik reestablishes, much to the distaste of King), this point establishes the root of the evil as Oedipal.

How naive we are when we buy into the ending's serene tranquility, Danny at the dock, coming to slow terms with his father's death. This may as well be a portrait of Jack some decades earlier, coming to terms with his own family trauma. How can "Jack's" voice (whatever the being was that Danny reads it as) not carry on in Danny, just as Jack's father's voice (was it Mark?) continues on, even after it is silenced. King underlines the return of the repressed father in a number of points, indicating his vision that our worldly pursuit is none other than a retrograde motion to our traumatic past: a, as Heidegger once said, I believe, race forward toward our past. The only way for the evil to stop is, as any Oedipan will tell you, is to kill the son and halt the lineage. Maybe Grady had it right: Jack, our true protagonist, had it right the first time, and Danny--our antagonist--twisted the story around for his own selfish ego-survival, inviting a sequel. "Here's Danny!"


John Barth's sperm (Lost in the Funhouse) implores the "son"--into whom he begins to metamorphosis at the moment of conception with the giant egg before him--to stop the vicious cycle. But nobody ever listens.


N.B.: Thirty years later after The Shining King's own son, writer Joe Hill (to whom [who "shines on"] The Shining is dedicated) writes Heart Shaped Box and uncannily echoes this notion of the ghost as a paternal figure who--with a voice, but without a body--with his own agency of absence, penetrates the 'son,' effectively rendering him a passive actor in his own body. An interesting household that must have been!